|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 37-38
Uncommon cause of wide complex tachycardia - Anterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia
Ramadan Fouad Arafa1, Hussein Heshmat2, Rajesh Rajan3
, Peter A Brady4
1 Department of Cardiology, Fujairah Hospital, Fujairah, UAE
2 Department of Cardiology, Fujairah Hospital, Fujairah, UAE; Department of Cardiology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
3 Department of Cardiology, Sabah Al-Ahmed Cardiac Center, Kuwait City, Kuwait
4 Department of Electrophysiology, Mercy Heart Health System, Lowa City, USA
|Date of Submission||28-Nov-2018|
|Date of Decision||18-Oct-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||22-Oct-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||13-Dec-2019|
Dr. Ramadan Fouad Arafa
P O Box 7498, Fujairah
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
A 24-year-old female presented to the emergency room with sudden-onset palpitations and shortness of breath for 4 h. We report a rare cause of anterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia.
Keywords: Anterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia, palpitations, wide QRS complex tachycardia
|How to cite this article:|
Arafa RF, Heshmat H, Rajan R, Brady PA. Uncommon cause of wide complex tachycardia - Anterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia. Ann Clin Cardiol 2019;1:37-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Arafa RF, Heshmat H, Rajan R, Brady PA. Uncommon cause of wide complex tachycardia - Anterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia. Ann Clin Cardiol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 5];1:37-8. Available from: http://www.onlineacc.org/text.asp?2019/1/1/37/273004
| Introduction|| |
In majority of the cases, fascicular tachycardia associated with underlying structural heart disease. It originates from the region of the posterior fascicle (or occasionally the anterior fascicle) of the left bundle branch and is partly propagated by the His-Purkinje network, which gives rise to narrow QRS complexes (0.11–0.14 s). Consequently, this arrhythmia is commonly misdiagnosed as supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).
| Case Report|| |
A 24-year-old female presented to the emergency room with sudden-onset palpitations and shortness of breath for 4 h. She denied associated chest pain, presyncope, or syncope. She admitted two similar episodes of shorter duration in the last 6 months, for which she did not seek medical attention. On examination at the time of admission, her heart rate was 203/min and regular; blood pressure was 112/80 mmHg. The remaining examination was unremarkable. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained during symptoms is shown in [Figure 1]. Subsequent evaluation revealed no evidence of structural heart disease.
|Figure 1: 12-lead ECG showing anterior fasicular ventricular tachycardia|
Click here to view
ECG showed wide QRS complex tachycardia with right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology and right-axis deviation. The QRS duration is 110 ms. AV dissociation is present.
Carotid massage, valsalva maneuver, and adenosine injection failed to revert to sinus rhythm. Verapamil 2.5 mg injection intravenous (iv) was given, and it was reverted to sinus rhythm [Figure 2].
She was continued on verapamil. Hospital stay was eventless and discharged on verapamil tablets.
| Discussion|| |
In the vast majority of cases, a wide complex tachycardia is due to ventricular tachycardia (VT), especially in the presence of structural heart disease such as prior myocardial infarction. VT can be seen in the absence of structural heart disease, the so-called “normal heart” VT. Most commonly, normal heart VT arises from the right or, less commonly, the left ventricular outflow tract. This origin results in an ECG pattern of left bundle branch block type with QRS transition beyond lead V3 or V4. Another type of normal heart VT is “verapamil-sensitive” VT which arises from the fascicular fibers of the left ventricle. Because the circuit arises within left ventricular myocardium, the ECG pattern is RBBB in V1 with a rightward or leftward axis depending on whether the exit point is the anterior or posterior fascicle. Usually, in the emergency room, the exact diagnosis of fascicular tachycardia seems difficult. It is commonly seen in young patients with no structural heart diseases. The arrhythmia may mimic either SVT or VT. Capture beats and fusion beats may be present on suggesting the diagnosis of VT rather than SVT. Our patient was initially diagnosed as SVT with RBBB, but the lack of response to vagal stimulation and adenosine made this diagnosis is less likely. The correct diagnosis was suggested by the presence of a broad complex tachycardia with a RBBB morphology and right-axis deviation. The QRS duration in fascicular tachycardia can vary from 100 to 140 ms. The RS interval is uniformly <80 ms in contrast with VT associated with structural heart disease where the RS interval is generally >100 ms. After reversion to sinus rhythm, nonspecific ST segment and T wave changes may be seen, most commonly in the inferior or lateral chest leads.
Fascicular tachycardia has been classified into three subtypes: (a) left posterior fascicular VT with a RBBB pattern and left-axis deviation (common form); (b) left anterior fascicular VT with RBBB pattern and right-axis deviation (uncommon form, like our patient); and (c) upper septal fascicular VT with a narrow QRS and normal-axis configuration (rare form).
The pharmacological treatment of choice for fascicular tachycardia is iv verapamil., However, propranolol may be used to terminate and cure the attack of fascicular tachycardia. Misdiagnosis of SVT is common and is mainly due to its dramatic response to calcium channel block. Sotalol and amiodarone have also been reported to be effective. Vagal maneuvers, adenosine, and lignocaine have no effective. Recurrences may be prevented by long-term, oral verapamil. Radiofrequency ablation has been reported to be successful in >80% of patients and complications are infrequent.
| Conclusion|| |
In most cases, a broad complex tachycardia should be presumed to be VT, especially in the presence of structural heart disease. Less commonly, VT may arise in the normal heart and may respond to adenosine or verapamil. However, before administering these agents, careful analysis of the 12-lead ECG should be undertaken to confirm the diagnosis. In all confirmed cases, iv verapamil is the drug of choice.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Edhouse J, Morris F. ABC of clinical electrocardiography: Broad complex tachycardia-part II. BMJ 2002;324:776-9.
Eynon CA, Howe L, Firoozan S. Fascicular tachycardia: Uncommon or just unrecognised? Emerg Med J 2002;19:477-8.
Andrade FR, Eslami M, Elias J, Kinoshita O, Nakazato Y, Marcus FI, et al.
Diagnostic clues from the surface ECG to identify idiopathic (fascicular) ventricular tachycardia: Correlation with electrophysiologic findings. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:2-8.
Ward DE, Nathan AW, Camm AJ. Fascicular tachycardia sensitive to calcium antagonists. Eur Heart J 1984;5:896-905.
Nogami A. Idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia: Assessment and treatment. Card Electrophysiol Rev 2002;6:448-57.
Anselme F, Boyle N, Josephson M. Incessant fascicular tachycardia: A cause of arrhythmia induced cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:760-3.
Akhtar M. Clinical spectrum of ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1990;82:1561-73.
Griffith MJ, Garratt CJ, Rowland E, Ward DE, Camm AJ. Effects of intravenous adenosine on verapamil-sensitive “idiopathic” ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:759-64.
Ramprakash B, Jaishankar S, Rao HB, Narasimhan C. Catheter ablation of fascicular ventricular tachycardia. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2008;8:193-202.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]